1. Home
  2. Articles
  3. Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ): How to Measure and Reduce It

Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ): How to Measure and Reduce It

11 min read

Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) refers to all the costs incurred from delivering products or services that fail to meet quality requirements.  In practice, COPQ includes everything spent on preventing, detecting, and correcting defects – from scrap and rework to warranty repairs and customer complaints.  It is often called the “price of nonconformance”. A familiar rule-of-thumb is that COPQ can run 10–20% of sales revenue or more, meaning poor quality can consume a large share of a company’s resources.  In short, COPQ is a critical metric: it quantifies how much money is lost to quality problems and highlights opportunities to boost profits by doing things right the first time.

Quality experts organize quality-related costs into four categories:

  • Prevention costs: Expenses for activities that prevent defects (e.g. quality planning, training, design reviews).
  • Appraisal costs: Costs of inspecting and testing products or processes (e.g. inspection, audits, calibration).
  • Internal failure costs: Costs from defects found before delivery (e.g. scrap, rework, re-inspection, downtime).
  • External failure costs: Costs when defects slip through to customers (e.g. warranty repairs, returns, complaints, liability).

Each category plays a role in COPQ: investing more in prevention and appraisal (the “cost of good quality”) usually lowers internal and external failures (the “cost of poor quality”).  For example, ASQ notes that prevention/appraisal expenses (quality programs, audits) are contrasted with failure costs (customer returns, rework).  Together, these four buckets make up an organization’s total Cost of Quality (CoQ), often expressed as:

  • CoQ = Cost of Good Quality + Cost of Poor Quality (where CoGQ = Prevention + Appraisal, CoPQ = Internal + External).
  • In many frameworks, COPQ = Internal Failure + External Failure (i.e. the two failure categories).

Measuring COPQ means quantifying each of these costs in dollars.  Companies tally actual expenses (labor, materials, warranty claims, lost sales, etc.) from defects and quality activities.  For example, internal failure costs include scrap and rework expenses, while external failure costs include warranty and customer-service costs.  A common approach is to sum the costs in each category – yielding COPQ = (Prevention + Appraisal + Internal Failures + External Failures) – or, more narrowly in Six Sigma, COPQ = Internal Failures + External Failures.  Many organizations then express COPQ as a percentage of revenue or cost of goods sold to track its impact over time.  Key metrics like scrap rate, defect rate, first-pass yield, or warranty claim costs are used alongside COPQ figures to diagnose problems.  For instance, comparing trends in COPQ to process metrics (e.g. defects per unit or first-pass yield) can pinpoint where quality is slipping.

Click Here to Download Readymade Quality, Production, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 22000, ISO 45001, FSSC 22000, HACCP, Food Safety, Integrated Management Systems (IMS), Lean Six Sigma, Project, Maintenance and Compliance Management etc. Kits.

Why COPQ Matters

Poor quality drains profits.  Every dollar spent on scrap, rework, returns or warranty could have been saved or earned instead.  As six-sigma experts note, measuring COPQ reveals exactly how much is lost to defects and waste.  When COPQ is high, profit margins shrink and efficiency suffers.  ASQ reports that many companies waste 15–20% of sales revenue on quality failures.  Even a “thriving” company can spend 10–15% of operations on COPQ.  Reducing COPQ directly boosts the bottom line by freeing money for growth.  Lower failure costs also improve customer satisfaction (fewer complaints and returns), market reputation, and competitive advantage.

COPQ is also a powerful management and communication tool.  Quality leaders use COPQ analysis to focus improvement efforts and make the business case for investments.  By tracking COPQ over time and benchmarking against industry norms, teams can quantify the return on quality initiatives.  For example, Gartner found an average CoQ around 5% of revenue, with roughly equal split between “good” quality (prevention/appraisal) and “poor” quality (failures).  Such data make the financial impact of quality visible to executives.

Categories of Quality Costs

Quality-related costs fall into four main categories.  Each category includes specific activities:

  • Prevention costs: Investments to avoid defects in the first place.  Examples: quality planning, process design, supplier evaluation, training, and maintenance of test equipment.  These costs are incurred before production and are an investment in doing it right.
  • Appraisal costs: Costs to inspect and verify quality at various stages.  Examples: incoming material inspection, in-process testing, final product audits, and equipment calibration.  Appraisal activities catch defects early (ideally) but add overhead to operations.
  • Internal failure costs: Costs of defects found during production (before shipping).  Examples: scrap, rework, re-testing, and downtime due to quality issues.  These costs represent wasted effort and materials within the plant.
  • External failure costs: Costs of defects found after delivery to the customer.  Examples: warranty service, returns, field repairs, replacements, customer support, and reputation damage.  External failures are often the most expensive (and damaging) because they include not only fixing the defect but also lost future business.

In modern quality frameworks (Juran, Crosby, Feigenbaum), “good quality” costs (prevention and appraisal) are seen as investments, while “poor quality” costs (internal/external failures) are avoidable wastes.  Organizations aim to spend more on prevention/appraisal so that failure costs shrink.  For example, ASQ’s Cost of Quality “trilogy” defines prevention and appraisal as cost of good quality, with failure costs comprising COPQ.  In practice, a higher ratio of prevention spending (versus failure spending) indicates a more proactive quality culture.

Click Here to Download Readymade Quality, Production, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 22000, ISO 45001, FSSC 22000, HACCP, Food Safety, Integrated Management Systems (IMS), Lean Six Sigma, Project, Maintenance and Compliance Management etc. Kits.

Measuring COPQ

Measuring COPQ means quantifying the dollars spent in each quality category.  A typical approach is:

  • Collect data by category.  Gather records of all quality-related expenditures – e.g. material costs of scrapped parts, labor for rework, inspection and audit hours, warranty payments, etc.  Often this involves cross-functional data (accounting, production, customer service).
  • Use standard formulas.  Many companies use the formula CoQ = CoGQ + CoPQ.  Here CoGQ (cost of good quality) = Prevention + Appraisal, and CoPQ (cost of poor quality) = Internal + External.  In simpler terms, COPQ = Internal Failures + External Failures.  The AODocs guide summarizes: “CoPQ = IFC + EFC”.  Others include prevention and appraisal in their COPQ if emphasizing total quality costs.
  • Calculate totals and benchmarks.  Sum each category to get total COPQ.  Often COPQ is expressed as a percentage of revenue or cost of goods sold for comparison.  It is also useful to track COPQ over time and compare to business or industry benchmarks.  For example, studies have found typical COPQ or CoQ around 5–15% of sales.
  • Use KPIs for insight.  In addition to dollar sums, quality teams monitor performance metrics that drive COPQ.  These include defect rates, first-pass yield (FPY), process capability, scrap and rework quantities, on-time delivery rate, customer complaint rate, and warranty claim costs.  For instance, organizations compare COPQ trends against defects-per-unit or FPY to identify root causes.  Tracking direct (scrap, repairs) vs. indirect (lost sales, customer dissatisfaction) costs also highlights hidden impacts beyond operations.

Because some quality costs are intangible (e.g. brand damage) or hard to track exactly, companies may estimate certain components.  A practical method is to assign average unit costs (labor hours, material rates) to quality events (an audit, a complaint) and multiply by frequency.  Software tools and QMS dashboards can streamline this data collection. Overall, the act of measuring COPQ exposes wasteful processes and guides improvement priorities.

Click Here to Download Readymade Quality, Production, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 22000, ISO 45001, FSSC 22000, HACCP, Food Safety, Integrated Management Systems (IMS), Lean Six Sigma, Project, Maintenance and Compliance Management etc. Kits.

Strategies to Reduce COPQ

Reducing COPQ requires both proactive and reactive strategies across the organization.  Effective tactics include:

  • Lean Six Sigma and Process Improvement:  Apply Lean (waste elimination) and Six Sigma (variation reduction) methods to address defects at their root.  For example, DMAIC (Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control) projects can target high-cost defect areas.  Lean tools like value stream mapping and 5S workplace organization identify waste and improve flow.  Poka-yoke (error-proofing) and FMEA (failure mode analysis) help design processes that prevent defects.  Statistical process control (SPC) charts and other DOE tools detect deviations early.  In short, a data-driven improvement culture (often formalized through Six Sigma belts or Kaizen events) systematically cuts variability and scrap.
  • Quality Management Systems (QMS):  Implement or strengthen a formal QMS (e.g. ISO 9001, IATF 16949) to embed best practices.  A QMS enforces quality planning, document control, and standard procedures for consistent outputs.  It ensures nonconformances are tracked and corrective actions are taken, preventing repeats.  Regular internal audits, management reviews, and continual improvement cycles (PDCA) keep quality on track.  Investing in a QMS may raise some prevention/appraisal costs but yields big drops in failure costs by standardizing quality at the design stage.
  • Training and Culture:  Build a quality-first culture by training all employees in quality awareness and problem-solving.  When everyone—from operators to executives—understands COPQ’s impact, teams will prioritize defect prevention.  Leadership commitment and employee empowerment (rewarding Kaizen ideas, quality improvements) make quality everyone’s responsibility.  Cross-functional quality teams and root-cause analysis sessions (e.g. 8D problem solving) accelerate fixes to quality issues.  Over time, a strong culture shifts focus from firefighting failures to preventing them, which gradually drives COPQ down.
  • Automation and Technology:  Where feasible, introduce automation to reduce human error and improve consistency.  Examples: automated testing/inspection equipment (vision systems, gauges), process monitoring sensors, and workflow software for error checking.  Automation can lower direct failure costs and generate objective data for decision-making.  However, avoid automating broken processes; always fix the process first.
  • Supplier and Design Quality:  Many COPQ costs originate upstream.  Work closely with suppliers to ensure incoming material quality (audits, qualification processes).  Integrate quality into product design (Design for Six Sigma, DFSS) to minimize latent defects.  Early problem prevention in the supply chain and product design is cheaper than downstream fixes.

By combining these strategies—often in a structured program—organizations can systematically cut their COPQ.  For example, focusing on prevention (training, robust designs) should allow organizations to reduce failure spending later.  Reducing COPQ not only saves money but also yields measurable benefits: higher profitability, greater efficiency, and improved customer loyalty.

Click Here to Download Readymade Quality, Production, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 22000, ISO 45001, FSSC 22000, HACCP, Food Safety, Integrated Management Systems (IMS), Lean Six Sigma, Project, Maintenance and Compliance Management etc. Kits.

Key Performance Metrics

To track progress, businesses use performance metrics tied to COPQ and quality. Common indicators include:

  • Defect and Yield Metrics: Defects per unit (DPU), defects per million opportunities (DPMO), and First-Pass Yield (FPY) show how many products require rework.  Improvement projects aim to raise FPY toward 100%.
  • Scrap and Rework Rates: Percentage of production lost to scrap or rework directly links to internal failure costs.
  • Warranty and Service Costs: Dollars spent on returns, repairs, and replacements indicate external failure costs.
  • Customer Satisfaction Metrics: Complaint rates, Net Promoter Score (NPS) and return rates signal the external impact of quality.
  • Cost of Quality Ratios: COPQ or CoQ as a % of sales or per-unit cost provides a financial KPI.  Tracking the breakdown (e.g. % spent on prevention vs. failures) reveals trends in investment vs. waste.

Regularly reviewing these metrics helps teams quantify COPQ savings from improvements and identify new problem areas.  For instance, if scrap rate drops by 50% after a Lean event, the associated cost savings can be compared to the investment in the event.  Making COPQ visible in scorecards and reports keeps management and staff aligned on quality goals.

Conclusion

The Cost of Poor Quality is a comprehensive measure of how much defects and inefficiency are costing an organization.  By understanding its components and drivers, businesses can target wasteful processes and justify quality investments.  Effective COPQ management involves measuring costs rigorously, applying proven quality frameworks (Six Sigma, Lean, ISO 9001, etc.), and continuously improving processes and culture.  In doing so, companies not only cut unnecessary costs but also achieve better products, higher customer satisfaction, and stronger profitability.  Ultimately, every dollar invested in prevention pays off by avoiding the many dollars lost to nonconformance.

Click HERE to download or any of the following documents:

Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ): How to Measure and Reduce It
4 Books to Enhance your Skills in Quality Management
The Secrets of High Performing Quality Management Professionals
You do not need to land a ‘great job’
Comments
* The email will not be published on the website.