ISO 50001:2018 is an international standard for Energy Management Systems (EnMS) that helps organizations systematically improve their energy performance. Like other ISO management standards (e.g. ISO 9001, ISO 14001), ISO 50001 is built on the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) continual-improvement model. In ISO 50001 this means the organization plans its energy policy and targets, implements them, monitors performance, and then acts on the results to drive further improvement. The PDCA loop never ends – each cycle raises the organization’s baseline of energy performance.
The PDCA cycle is the foundation of ISO 50001’s continual improvement approach. In the Plan phase the organization establishes its EnMS groundwork (energy policy, review, baseline, objectives, etc.). In Do it implements the plans (competence, operational controls, action plans). In Check it measures and evaluates energy performance (monitoring, audits). In Act management reviews the results and makes corrections for continual improvement
In the Plan phase the organization sets the EnMS context, policy and goals. ISO 50001:2018 clauses 4, 5 and 6 cover this planning work. Clause 4 (“Context of the organization”) requires understanding internal/external issues and stakeholder needs related to energy. Clause 5 requires top management to establish an energy policy (Clause 5.2) and define roles/responsibilities (5.3) for the EnMS, showing commitment to continual improvement of energy use.
Under Clause 6, the organization must then conduct an energy review (6.1.2) to analyze historical energy data and identify Significant Energy Uses (SEUs). It establishes an energy baseline (6.1.3) – a reference period for measuring improvement – and defines energy performance indicators (EnPIs) (6.1.3) to quantify performance. Finally, the organization sets measurable objectives and targets (6.2) for energy improvement and documents action plans to reach them.
In practice this means, for example, appointing an energy manager or team, writing a clear energy policy, and then performing a detailed review of all energy sources and uses in the facilities. The team “identify[s] the significant energy users, and prioritize[s] the opportunities for energy performance improvement” during this planning phase. The plan phase outputs (policy, objectives, action plans, EnPIs) form the foundation for later PDCA steps. (Many organizations find it helpful to document the plan-phase requirements in a table or checklist mapped to ISO 50001 clauses 4.1–6.2.)
Click Here to Download Readymade Lean Manufacturing, Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 22000, ISO 45001, FSSC 22000, HACCP, Food Safety & Integrated Management Systems (IMS) Templates.
With the plan in place, the Do phase puts the EnMS into action. Clauses 7 and 8 cover support and operation. Clause 7 requires providing the supporting resources: ensuring personnel have necessary competence, training and awareness (7.2–7.3); implementing communication processes (7.4); and maintaining documented information (7.5) such as the energy policy, procedures and records. Clause 8 requires operational planning and control (8.1) of the identified SEUs, and design/procurement practices to improve energy efficiency. In short, Do means executing the energy action plans, using good documentation and controls to ensure consistency and capability.
For example, top management makes sure staff and contractors are trained and aware of their energy roles (Clause 7.2–7.3). The organization then modifies processes and equipment operation as planned: it operationalizes the energy objectives by applying energy-efficient procedures, work instructions or schedules to SEUs (Clause 8.1). It even considers energy performance when designing or purchasing new facilities/equipment (Clauses 8.3–8.4). All action items from the planning step – such as installing metering, upgrading motors, or changing control strategies – are implemented in this Do phase. In short, Do is about making the plan real: “resources are made available and responsibilities determined. Plant staff … must be aware and capable of carrying out their energy management responsibilities.”
In the Check phase, the organization evaluates how well the EnMS and energy objectives are working. Clause 9 (Performance Evaluation) has several parts. Clause 9.1 mandates monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation of the key characteristics that determine energy performance, including tracking EnPIs and comparing actual energy use to the baseline. The organization must regularly evaluate legal compliance (9.1.2) with energy-related laws and other requirements. Clause 9.2 requires an internal audit program to verify that the EnMS conforms to ISO 50001 and is effectively implemented. Nonconformities identified by audits or monitoring trigger corrective actions (Clause 10.1, discussed below).
Together, these Check activities “verify that the EnMS is functioning properly and generating the planned results”. The organization collects data from meters and systems, calculates actual energy performance, and compares it against targets and baselines. It documents trends for management review. For example, “[the] processes are monitored with regard to … the goals of the organization’s energy management program. The results are documented and reported to top management”. Any gap between expected and actual performance is investigated. The internal audit ensures procedures are followed. The Check phase produces performance reports and identifies improvement opportunities and nonconformities.
Click Here to Download Readymade Lean Manufacturing, Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 22000, ISO 45001, FSSC 22000, HACCP, Food Safety & Integrated Management Systems (IMS) Templates.
The Act phase is where top management uses the review of results to drive change. Clause 9.3 (management review) and Clause 10 (Improvement) apply here. Management review meetings (9.3) evaluate audit findings, compliance status, EnPIs and progress on objectives. Based on this, management may update the energy policy, revise targets, reallocate resources, or direct new projects. Clause 10.1 requires the organization to handle nonconformities: identify root causes and take corrective (and preventive) actions. Finally, Clause 10.2 explicitly calls for continual improvement of the EnMS and energy performance. In PDCA terms, Act closes the loop by formalizing changes that will be implemented in the next cycle.
For instance, Emerson Consulting notes that in the Act phase “top management prepares [a management] review… The results will be evaluated on their performance level. If necessary, corrective or preventive actions can be initiated. Energy-relevant processes are optimized and new strategic goals are derived”. Similarly, DOE’s EnMS Guide emphasizes that management review should ensure “continuing suitability, adequacy, effectiveness and continual improvement in energy performance”. In practice this means updating the energy policy and targets over time, improving documentation, or launching new projects (e.g. revising the energy baseline when production changes). Each completed PDCA cycle should yield a higher level of energy performance than before.
Each PDCA loop in ISO 50001 is explicitly geared to continual energy improvement. By planning targets based on an energy baseline and then measuring actual performance, organizations can quantify their gains in efficiency. Over successive cycles the energy baseline itself can be periodically adjusted to reflect prior improvements (so that future gains remain meaningful). This iterative approach embeds a culture of ongoing progress: as one ISO brochure puts it, ISO 50001 enables organizations to “continually improve energy management”.
In other words, ISO 50001 turns energy efficiency from a one-off project into a systematic, self-reinforcing management discipline.Real-world cases confirm these benefits. For example, the Hilton hotel chain used ISO 50001 to unite its global properties under a single energy policy and targets; as a result, Hilton cut its energy intensity by 20.6% (and carbon intensity by 30.0%) against a 2008 baseline. The Irish national police (An Garda Síochána) achieved ~21.9% energy savings and 9.3% cost savings while saving over USD 11.3 million through their EnMS. In industry, Catalyst Paper’s Crofton mill (Canada) saw a 5.6% reduction in purchased electricity from 2012–2015 (with higher production) after implementing ISO 50001 alongside its strategic energy program. Even small incremental improvements accumulate: one U.S. water utility (Des Moines Water Works) reports achieving over 10% reduction in energy intensity in four years after adopting ISO 50001, driven by monthly energy reviews and top-management support. These cases illustrate how PDCA, when rigorously applied to energy, generates real savings and efficiency gains.
Click Here to Download Readymade Lean Manufacturing, Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 22000, ISO 45001, FSSC 22000, HACCP, Food Safety & Integrated Management Systems (IMS) Templates.
ISO 50001 shares its overall structure and philosophy with other ISO management standards. In fact, the 2018 revision aligned ISO 50001 with the common “High-Level Structure” (Annex SL) used by ISO 9001 (quality) and ISO 14001 (environment). All these standards use PDCA, require top-management commitment, objectives, internal audits and management review, and can be integrated easily. ISO itself notes that ISO 50001 “follows the PDCA model” and “shares a common structure with other ISO management system standards”. Thus, an organization familiar with ISO 9001 or ISO 14001 will find similar clause organization and audit approaches in ISO 50001.
However, ISO 50001 also has unique energy-specific requirements. Its focus is exclusively on energy use and efficiency, whereas ISO 14001 addresses the broader environmental impact (of which energy is only one aspect). For example, ISO 50001’s energy review (Clause 6.1.2) and baseline (6.1.3) concepts have no direct counterpart in ISO 9001/14001. ISO 50001 explicitly requires Energy Performance Indicators (EnPIs) and Energy Baselines to quantify improvements, and it demands documented energy action plans. These features go beyond the more general “objectives and metrics” in ISO 9001/14001. As one commentary notes, ISO 50001 “focuses specifically on energy… [and] considers the design of energy-using equipment, policies and processes that contribute to poor energy performance” more deeply than ISO 14001 does. Similarly, ISO 50001 requires more mandatory documentation – for example energy data, baselines and EnPIs – than ISO 14001.
In summary, the commonalities lie in the PDCA cycle and management-system approach, but ISO 50001’s unique elements are its energy review, baseline, EnPIs, and energy-specific operational controls. Organizations often implement ISO 50001 alongside ISO 14001 (or ISO 9001) to cover all aspects of quality, environment and energy.
Successful ISO 50001 implementations emphasize leadership commitment, data-driven planning, and structured follow-through. A few best practices include:
Click Here to Download Readymade Lean Manufacturing, Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 22000, ISO 45001, FSSC 22000, HACCP, Food Safety & Integrated Management Systems (IMS) Templates.
The PDCA cycle in ISO 50001 provides a powerful framework for systematic energy management. By planning with a clear policy and targets, doing by implementing projects and controls, checking with measurement and audits, and acting through management review, organizations continuously drive down energy use. This structured approach – aligned with ISO 9001/14001 methodology – ensures that energy performance becomes a core part of management practice. As case studies show, this leads to tangible savings (often double-digit percentage improvements) and a culture of efficiency that grows stronger with each PDCA iteration. For energy managers, auditors and executives, understanding the PDCA mapping in ISO 50001 (clauses 4 through 10) is essential for designing an effective EnMS and sustaining ongoing improvement in energy performance.
Click HERE to download or any of the following documents: