Managing Material Flow in High-Mix, Low-Volume (HMLV) Manufacturing

High-Mix, Low-Volume (HMLV) manufacturing refers to production environments with many product variants and low quantities of each variant.  In contrast to mass production, HMLV emphasizes flexibility and customization.  Companies may produce hundreds or thousands of unique parts in batch sizes of only a few units.  This model is common in industries like aerospace, medical devices, electronics, and specialty machinery, where each customer order often yields a different configuration.  By producing on a make-to-order basis, HMLV manufacturers can meet diverse customer needs and adapt rapidly to design changes. However, this versatility brings complex material flow requirements: each product variant may require different parts, processes, and routings, and so material handling, inventory, and scheduling must accommodate extreme variety.

Operational Characteristics of HMLV Manufacturing

HMLV operations combine elements of job shops and flexible manufacturing systems.  Key characteristics include:

• Product Variety: A large array of distinct product numbers, each in small volume.  For example, an equipment OEM might build many custom machines, each with hundreds of unique parts in the bill of materials (BOM).
• Frequent Changeovers: Production lines and machines must be reconfigured often.  Every part family or order change may require new setups and tooling.
• Variable Processes: Different products often have different routing through the shop.  Most HMLV shops are generalized job shops with multi-directional flow: parts may take diverse paths rather than a single assembly line.
• High Labor Skills Required: Workers must handle many operations and part types. Training and work instructions are more complex, since operators “must learn the work procedures for many different products”.
• Complex BOMs and Part Flows: Bills of materials can include hundreds or thousands of unique items.  Managing this BOM complexity is crucial: even one revision error can cause assembly delays or scrap.
• Custom Quality Requirements: Many HMLV products have strict specifications (e.g. medical implants), so quality control must adapt to varied geometries and materials.

These factors make HMLV manufacturing inherently more complex than high-volume production. The benefits are increased customization, responsiveness and risk spreading (selling many variants hedges against any one product failing).  But the trade-offs include lower utilization, higher per-unit cost, and greater planning difficulty.

Click HERE for Industrial Automation, ISO Management Systems (ISO 9001, 45001, 14001, 50001, 22000, Integrated Management Systems etc.), Process Safety (HAZOP Study, LOPA, QRA, HIRA, SIS), Quality Management, Engineering, , Project Management, Lean Six Sigma & Process Improvement Self-paced Training Courses

Material Flow Challenges in HMLV

Material flow – the movement of parts and components through production – faces several challenges in HMLV environments:

• Inventory Management: A broad part mix means many components must be stocked, often in small quantities. Balancing this wide SKU array is difficult. Overstocking even a small variety of slow-moving parts wastes capital and space, while understocking can halt production. Complex BOMs exacerbate this: manufacturers must track thousands of part revisions accurately to prevent assembly errors.
• Layout and Routing Flexibility: No fixed flow pattern suits all products. HMLV shops often adopt generalized job-shop layouts (open shops or U-shaped cells) to allow multi-directional routing. For example, an “open field” layout (parts can flow in random order) is sometimes used, with many machines and handling equipment to support dynamic routing. Such flexibility increases material handling complexity and demands more staging areas and conveyors.
• Scheduling Complexity: Short runs and urgent orders make scheduling highly dynamic. Frequent changeovers introduce significant downtime and uneven workloads. In fact, “frequent changeovers and setup costs” are a defining challenge of HMLV production. Matching mixed orders to limited capacity requires constant replanning. Traditional level scheduling (Heijunka) is often infeasible, so pull-based and hybrid scheduling methods (discussed below) are adopted.
• Production Bottlenecks: With many part types and unique operations, bottlenecks can shift unpredictably. Identifying real-time bottlenecks is hard without system-wide visibility. For example, Hitachi’s Omika facility introduced IoT sensing to record “4M” factors (man, machine, material, method) and track parts via RFID. This was needed because HMLV lead times vary so much that standard capacity planning was inaccurate without real-time data.
• Supply Chain Strain: Sourcing specialty components for small batches often means dealing with a broad supplier network. HMLV often relies on many niche suppliers, increasing risk of delays or miscommunication. Low-volume ordering can also inflate part costs. In summary, “HMLV relies on a broad supplier network to source materials for small, specialized production runs,” which raises risks of delay and scarcity.
• Quality and Documentation: High mix and custom specifications mean standard operating procedures multiply. Managing documentation for thousands of unique products is challenging. Without digital tools, manufacturers face a “documentation avalanche”. Quality data is harder to capture and trace when each product has a different recipe. Ensuring every custom part meets spec (e.g. surgical tool dimensions) often requires advanced inspection methods (industrial CT, in-line sensors) and stringent traceability.

These challenges can lead to inefficiencies: lower throughput, higher work-in-process (WIP), and missed due dates. Table-level complexity and special setups reduce effective production time. Effective HMLV operations must therefore implement tailored strategies to keep material flowing.

Best Practices and Methodologies

Despite these challenges, established best practices – often adaptations of lean and agile methods – can optimize HMLV material flow:

• Lean and Pull-Based Flow: Lean principles still apply, but must be adapted. Core lean concepts like pull production remain valid. For HMLV, simple pull/Kanban systems are extended with buffers. One approach is CONWIP (Constant Work-In-Process) – a pull system that controls total WIP instead of per-part Kanban. In CONWIP, a card follows a batch through all processes, effectively limiting the number of jobs in the system. CONWIP can handle mixed flows, though it may require grouping parts into “families” to be effective. Another method is POLCA (Paired-Cell Overlapping Loops of Cards), a hybrid pull/push system designed for high variety. POLCA issues two cards per job: one travels with the job, the other returns to signal availability, thus controlling release of new orders. It was explicitly “devised for highly engineered production, small batches and high product variety”.
• Kanban and Buffer Inventory: While pure one-piece flow is impractical in HMLV, limited inventory buffers are maintained strategically. As Lean literature advises, manufacturers should flow where they can and pull where they cannot flow. This often means classifying products (e.g. ABC analysis into “runners, repeaters, strangers”) and holding small Kanban stock for the most common items. For example, some finished goods or subassemblies may have small inventory to buffer variability, reducing lead times for customer orders.
• SMED and Quick Changeovers: High setup times hurt efficiency in HMLV. Single-Minute Exchange of Die (SMED) is a lean tool to reduce changeover times. Applying SMED to molds, jigs, or tools can significantly lower downtime between runs. As one source notes for injection molding: “Lean manufacturing techniques, such as single-minute exchange of die (SMED), reduce tooling changeover time and costs with a high product mix”.
• Cellular and Flexible Layouts: Grouping similar processes (cellular manufacturing) can reduce handling. In HMLV, generalized cells or U-shaped cells are common. A U-shaped line lets material be fed from one side while a multi-skilled operator works on both sides. More flexible systems like FMS (Flexible Manufacturing Systems) – often robots with multiple tools – allow rapid reconfiguration. Research suggests an “open field circular FMS layout” with robotic cells can combine flexibility with cost-effectiveness.
• Cross-Training and Documentation: Since workers change tasks frequently, strong standard work and documentation are needed. Digital work instructions (EWI) on tablets or screens can guide operators through many variants with minimal error. We discuss digital tools below, but from a methodology perspective, continuous training (job instructions, shadowing) is essential for handling frequent product changes.
• Integrated Planning (ERP/MES): Aligning planning with execution is critical. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems manage long-term schedule, capacity and inventory, but they can’t cope with minute-by-minute shop floor changes. Thus, integration with Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) is advised. MES provides the real-time control, data collection, and dynamic workflows that HMLV needs. (For example, MES can enforce that an operator scans the correct work order and use the right component, ensuring that “an operator cannot proceed…until mandatory quality data is captured”.)

Click HERE for Industrial Automation, ISO Management Systems (ISO 9001, 45001, 14001, 50001, 22000, Integrated Management Systems etc.), Process Safety (HAZOP Study, LOPA, QRA, HIRA, SIS), Quality Management, Engineering, , Project Management, Lean Six Sigma & Process Improvement Self-paced Training Courses

These methods and tools are often combined. In practice, an HMLV factory might implement cellular cells, use Kanban or POLCA for release, apply SMED for quick die changes, and coordinate everything with an MES. Figure below summarizes some key material-flow methods:

Digital and Industry 4.0 Solutions

Emerging technologies are playing an increasing role in HMLV material flow:

• IoT and Real-Time Tracking: Internet of Things (IoT) devices (RFID, sensors, cameras) provide visibility into every part and operation. For example, Hitachi’s Omika factory (HMLV electronics) installed RFID tags on parts and machinery, and “record[ed] the 4M (man, machine, material, method) factors” in real-time. The IoT network gave a continuous view of where components were and where true bottlenecks lay. An IoT approach enabled “overall product quality and efficiency” improvements by linking digital data from legacy systems. In practice, IoT can trigger automatic Kanban replenishments (digital Kanban) and alert managers to missing parts or delays.
• Advanced Planning and AI: Artificial Intelligence and advanced analytics can improve forecasting and scheduling in HMLV’s volatile environment. AI-driven planning tools can optimize job sequencing, predict machine failures, and even automate quoting for custom parts (as discussed in [7]). An adaptive production planning system can continuously re-balance the schedule to meet due dates with minimal WIP.
• Digital Twins and Simulation: Creating a digital replica of the production system allows “what-if” scenario testing without disrupting the shop floor. For instance, a complex OEM used a digital twin simulation to optimize material handling and scheduling. This led to a 12% throughput increase and 14% cycle time reduction by identifying bottlenecks and rebalancing resources. Digital twins can integrate live data (ERP/MES) and AI to forecast delays and suggest corrective actions in real time.
• Automation and Robotics: Flexible automation is increasingly used in HMLV shops. CNC machining and multi-axis robots can handle a variety of parts with minimal changeover. In practice, collaborative robots (cobots) with quick end-effector changes allow fast reprogramming for different tasks. The image above shows a CNC-machined impeller, illustrating the kind of complex part possible in low-volume runs.
• Additive Manufacturing: 3D printing is uniquely suited for custom, complex parts. It incurs high setup cost but a cost advantage for small volumes. Additive processes eliminate many tooling changes and can produce one-off geometries. For example, medical implants with lattice structures can be 3D-printed, as shown above. Using additive reduces lead times for prototypes and specialized parts, fitting HMLV’s need for fast turnaround.
• Integrated ERP/MES Platforms: Modern software suites blur the line between ERP and MES. Tight integration ensures that custom orders in the ERP automatically generate detailed work instructions in the MES. A combined ERP/MES (often cloud-based) is thus recommended to close the “execution gap”.
• Lean Digital Tools: Software tools (digitized Kanban boards, visual dashboards, mobile alerts) can implement lean practices at scale. For example, electronic Kanban systems using IoT sensors can automatically signal replenishment. Data analytics can identify hidden wastes in material flow, supporting continuous improvement initiatives.

Each of these technologies complements traditional methods. For instance, while a lean pull system reduces WIP, IoT and MES ensure that the limited WIP is the right part, at the right workstation, at the right time.

Click HERE for Industrial Automation, ISO Management Systems (ISO 9001, 45001, 14001, 50001, 22000, Integrated Management Systems etc.), Process Safety (HAZOP Study, LOPA, QRA, HIRA, SIS), Quality Management, Engineering, , Project Management, Lean Six Sigma & Process Improvement Self-paced Training Courses

Case Studies and Examples

Digital Twin in Electronics Assembly:  A high-mix electronics manufacturer struggled with unpredictable cycle times and excess WIP. They built a digital twin of their facility, integrating MES/ERP data. Within weeks, the simulation identified inefficient material routes and bottlenecks. The results were dramatic: throughput increased by ~12%, cycle times fell by 14%, and scrap from delays dropped by over 30%. This example shows how simulation and AI-driven scheduling can optimize material flow without halting production.

HMLV in Defense/Aerospace: Government-operated maintenance facilities often operate HMLV job shops (repairing unique equipment). One study applied group technology and cellular layouts in a defense shop. By grouping similar parts and focusing on bottleneck machines with automated tools, they improved throughput and aligned with ERP inventory practices. Such cellularization (identifying “part families” and creating mini-lines) is a common remedy in repair/overhaul HMLV contexts.IoT-Enabled Production (Hitachi Omika): Hitachi’s Omika Works implemented an IoT-based production system for HMLV electronic components. They deployed hundreds of RFID tags on parts and carts, creating a real-time “digital thread” of every item’s location. By doing so, they could coordinate information across departments and trace each custom order through the factory. This level of visibility allowed shop-floor teams to see the “true bottlenecks” and understand production capacity dynamically.

Robotic Workcells for Surface Finishing: Surface-finishing shops (e.g. sanding, polishing) often run HMLV operations. One robotics integrator developed a smart robotic workcell tailored to high-mix finishing tasks. By programming the robot and sensors for quick retooling between different part shapes and finishes, small shops could automate processes with minimal downtime. Such adaptive automation helps stabilize material flow in SMEs with highly variable jobs.

Emerging Trends and Future Directions

HMLV material flow will continue evolving under Industry 4.0 influences:

• Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning: AI-driven analytics will become standard for demand forecasting, dynamic scheduling, and anomaly detection. For example, AI can continually adjust buffer levels or Kanban sizes based on learning demand patterns, further reducing waste.
• Digital Twins & Augmented Reality: As digital twins mature, real-time “what-if” analysis will be embedded into daily operations. AR interfaces may guide workers through custom tasks (e.g. overlaying assembly steps on a part), improving flexibility and reducing errors in high-mix contexts.
• Collaborative Robotics: Cobots will proliferate, handling diverse tasks with easy teachability. Multi-purpose robotic cells that swap tools or end-effectors will make automation cost-effective even for one-off jobs.
• Additive and Hybrid Manufacturing: Beyond prototyping, additive methods will blend with machining (e.g. printing near-net shapes then finishing by CNC) for optimal material use. Hybrid machines (combining 3D printing and milling) already enable complex geometries with precision, ideal for HMLV parts.
• Edge Computing and Analytics: With IoT sensors everywhere, edge computing can process data on the shop floor, enabling instant adjustments (e.g. auto-stopping a cell when a quality sensor flags a defect). Big Data from HMLV production can uncover patterns and best-practice adjustments across a range of products.
• Supply Chain Digitization: In HMLV, long, fragmented supply chains can be synchronized using blockchain and IoT. Real-time tracking of components from supplier to shop can tighten inventory control and traceability, mitigating the risk of missing critical parts for custom builds.

Click HERE for Industrial Automation, ISO Management Systems (ISO 9001, 45001, 14001, 50001, 22000, Integrated Management Systems etc.), Process Safety (HAZOP Study, LOPA, QRA, HIRA, SIS), Quality Management, Engineering, , Project Management, Lean Six Sigma & Process Improvement Self-paced Training Courses

A table below summarizes how some of these methods and tools compare:

Conclusion

High-mix, low-volume manufacturing demands a nuanced approach to material flow.  The key is flexibility – in processes, tools, and planning systems – coupled with the discipline of lean thinking.  Manufacturers must tightly coordinate inventory and scheduling for many part types, often using pull systems (Kanban, CONWIP, POLCA) instead of traditional push-only planning.  They must also leverage technology: digital tracking, AI, and simulation can tame the complexity.  By combining lean principles (quick setups, cellular flow) with Industry 4.0 tools (MES, IoT, robotics, digital twins), HMLV plants can achieve responsive, efficient flow.  Real-world cases show significant gains – higher throughput, lower cycle time, and less waste – when these methods are applied.  As customer demand for customization grows, mastering material flow in HMLV environments will remain a competitive imperative for manufacturers.

Click HERE for Industrial Automation, ISO Management Systems (ISO 9001, 45001, 14001, 50001, 22000, Integrated Management Systems etc.), Process Safety (HAZOP Study, LOPA, QRA, HIRA, SIS), Quality Management, Engineering, , Project Management, Lean Six Sigma & Process Improvement Self-paced Training Courses

• Industrial Process Automation Training Course
• Advanced Digital Manufacturing & Product Design Technologies Training Courses
  
• Integrated Management Systems (IMS) Implementation Masterclass
• Integrated ISO Management Systems (IMS) Audit – Best Practices
• ISO 19011: Auditing Management Systems – Techniques & Best Practices
• ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems Lead Auditor
• ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems Lead Auditor
• ISO 45001 Occupational Health & Safety Lead Auditor
• ISO 50001 Energy Management Systems Lead Auditor
• Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS) Implementation
• ISO 22000 Food Safety Management Systems Lead Auditor
• FSSC 22000 Lead Auditor (Food Safety)
• ISO/IEC 17025 Laboratory Management Systems (LMS) Certification
• Laboratory Management Systems (LMS) Essentials
  
• Lean Six Sigma Yellow Belt Certification Course
• Lean Six Sigma Green Belt Certification
• Lean Six Sigma Black Belt Certification
• Lean Manufacturing Certification Course
• Six Sigma for Manufacturing & Operational Efficiency
• Statistical Process Control (SPC) Training Course
• Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA) Training Course
• Strategic Supply Chain Management Training Course
• Operational Risk Management Training Course
• Quality Management Training Course
• Health, Safety and Environment (HSE) Training Course
• Advanced Digital Manufacturing & Product Design Technologies Training Courses
  
• Safety Instrumented System
• Hazards and Operability Study (HAZOP)
• Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA)
• Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA)
•  Process Safety Management (PSM)
• Industrial Process Safety